RATIONAL ALTITUDE STRUCTURE FOR PLACING THE WIND EQUIPMENT IN THE CONDITIONS OF UKRAINE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15802/stp2018/129651

Keywords:

altitude structure, mast, tower, Lira software, finite element method

Abstract

Purpose. For wind observations special wind equipment is used, which should be placed at a certain height above the ground for a relatively short period of time. Such equipment can be transferred from one region to ano-ther. Therefore, the main purpose of the studies outlined in the publication is the selection and justification of the construction of a mobile altitude structure for the placement of wind equipment in the natural and climatic conditions of Ukraine. Methodology. To achieve this purpose, first we chose the type of altitude structure from the existing ones. Next, we determined the nature of the effect of natural and climatic loads on these structures in accordance with the norms of Ukraine. After this, we performed a numerical analysis of the work of altitude structures by the finite element method on the basis of the Lira software. Also, an economic evaluation of the expediency of using altitude structures of a certain type was made, taking into account the lease of the land plot for their location. Findings. According to the results of the conducted studies, it should be noted that for the conditions of Ukraine a steel tower is the most rational mobile altitude structure for placing wind equipment for a relatively small interval of time. In comparison with a steel mast of a similar height, the total cost of its installation and operation is lower. The X-cross brace for steel towers from 50 to 60 m in height is more rational than the K-brace. Herewith, its usage decreases the construction cost almost by half. Taking into account the possibility of transportation, the separation of the steel tower into assembly units of 8-10 m in length is the most effective. Originality. The authors proposed the method for estimating the economic efficiency of choosing a mobile altitude structure depending on the natural and climatic conditions of the terrain. In accordance with this method, the most rational type of altitude structure is determined taking into account its mobility. Practical value. Application of the proposed approaches and the solutions allows reducing the time required for calculations in design practice and also more reasonably approaching the choice of design solutions for altitude structures.

Author Biographies

R. A. Savchenko, Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan

Faculty «Industrial and Civil Engineering», Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan, Lazaryan St., 2, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49010,
e-mail kriateddd@gmail.com

D. О. Bannikov, Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan

Dep. «Construction Production and Geodesy», Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan, Lazaryan St., 2, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49010,
e-mail bdo2010@rambler.ru

I. I. Kyrpa, Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan

Dep. «Construction Production and Geodesy», Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan, Lazaryan St., 2, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49010,

References

Bannikov, D. O., & Guslistaja, A. E. (2011). Korrektirovka rezultatov rascheta napryazheniy po MKE metodom HSS. Visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho natsionalnoho universytetu zaliznychnoho transportu imeni akademika V. Lazariana, 38, 134-141. (in Russian)

Bannikov, D. O., & Guslistaja, A. E. (2011). Otsenka skhodimosti napryazheniy v slozhnykh metallokonstruktsiyakh metodom konechnykh elementov. Metallurgical and Mining Industry, 4, 93-96. (in Russian)

Bannikov, D. O. (2017). Otsinka praktychnoi zbizhnosti rezultativ analizu plastynchastykh modelei v metodi skinchenykh elementiv. Novi tekhnolohii v budivnytstvi, 32, 26-31. (in Ukranian)

Vodopyanov, R. Y., Titok, V. P., & Artamonova, A. E. (2014). Programmnyy kompleks Lira-SAPR 2014. Rukovodstvo polzovatelya. Obuchayushchie primery. Moscow. (in Russian)

Systema nadiinosti ta bezpeky v budivnytstvi. Navantazhennia i vplyvy. Normy proektuvannia, 70 DBN В.1.2-2-2006 (with changes) (2007). (in Ukranian)

Loginov, V. F. (2012). Radiatsionnye faktory i dokazatelnaya baza sovremennykh izmeneniy klimata. Minsk: Belaruskaya navuka (in Russian)

Luchitskaya, I. O., Belaya, N. I., & Arbuzov, S. A. (2014). Klimat Novosibirska i ego izmeneniya. Novosibirsk: SO RAN Publisher. (in Russian)

Brönnimann, S. (2015). The Machinery: Mechanisms Behind Climatic Changes. Climatic Changes Since 1700, 55, 71-166. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19042-6_3 (in English)

Dow, J. O. (2015). A Concise Overview of the Finite Element Method. New York: Momentum Press. (in English)

Ebrahimi, F. (2012). Finite Element Analysis-New trends and Developments. London: InTech. doi: 10.5772/3352 (in English)

Zhuang, Z., Liu, Z., Cheng, B., & Liao, J. (2014). Extended Finite Element Method. In Overview of Extended Finite Element (pp. 1-12). Amsterdam. doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-407717-1.00001-7. (in English)

Gatica, G. N. (2014). A Simple Introduction to the Mixed Finite Element Method. Theory and Application. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-03695-3 (in English)

Liu, G. R. (2014). The Finite Element Method. A Practical Course. Amsterdam: Elsevier LTD. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-08-098356-1.00014-x (in English)

Vear, F. (2016). Changes in sunflower breeding over the last fifty years. OCL, 23,2, 1-8. doi: 10.1051/ocl/2016006.doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2016006 (in English)

Published

2018-04-27

How to Cite

Savchenko, R. A., Bannikov D. О., & Kyrpa, I. I. (2018). RATIONAL ALTITUDE STRUCTURE FOR PLACING THE WIND EQUIPMENT IN THE CONDITIONS OF UKRAINE. Science and Transport Progress, (2(74), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.15802/stp2018/129651

Issue

Section

TRANSPORT CONSTRUCTION