MODELING THE MANIFESTATIONS OF THE HUMAN FACTOR OF THE MARITIME CREW

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15802/stp2018/147937

Keywords:

human factor, behavioral model, teammate interaction, abnormal situations

Abstract

Purpose. The article investigates the trajectories of the watch team members in maritime transport that lead to a decrease in the level of security. A formal apparatus is proposed, as well as software and hardware to identify the location of members of the watch team during the execution of complex maneuvers. Methodology. In the course of constructing the mathematical model, the most common schemes of interaction of watch members at the time of performing complex maneuvers were considered. The general problem was considered as a series of watchkeeping interactions that solve micro-tasks of ship control at a certain moment. As a result of simulation it is determined that a key role is played by the first mate, who is the most likely to deviate from the instructions, because of excessive activity or passivity in actions. Also, interaction models of members of the watchkeeping service within the framework of a multi-day ship passage are considered. Findings. Research shows that the formation of established interactions depends on the level of experience and qualifications of the members of the watchkeeping service. Overly active relocation of the mate, as well as function duplication of individual members of the watchkeeping service adversely affects the safety level in ship management. Software and hardware tools are proposed that allow identifying the location and movements of the watch team members, indicating deviations from the watchkeeping instructions for maritime transport. Originality. The authors for the first time developed software and hardware for analyzing the movements of the watchkeeping service members, allowing identifying violations of official instructions. Practical value. Based on the developed software and hardware identification of positions and movements of the members of the watchkeeping service, it becomes possible to more effectively manage the process of training navigators during simulator practice on the basis of the navigation simulator NTPRO 5000 at the Kherson State Maritime Academy, Ukraine. These studies can also be useful in studying the discipline «Organization of the crew actions in extreme conditions».

Author Biographies

P. S. Nosov, Kherson State Maritime Academy

Dep. «Navigation and Electronic Navigation Systems», Kherson State Maritime Academy, Ushakov Av., 20, Kherson, Ukraine, 73000, tel. +38 (050) 909 06 08, Email: pason@ukr.net

I. V. Palamarchuk, Kherson State Maritime Academy

Dep. «Navigation and Electronic Navigation Systems», Kherson State Maritime Academy, Ushakov Av., 20, Kherson, Ukraine, 73000, tel. +38 (050) 909 06 08, Email: pason@ukr.net

M. S. Safonov, Odessa National Polytechnic University, Kherson Polytechnic College

Dep. «Computer Engineering and Software Engineering», Odessa National Polytechnic University, Kherson Polytechnic College, Nebesna Sotnia St., 23, Kherson, Ukraine, 73000, tel. +38 (066) 245 81 85, Email: nemko85@gmail.com

V. I. Novikov, Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding

Dep. «Shipbuilding and Power Engineering», Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding, Kherson Branch, Ushakov Av., 44, Kherson, Ukraine, 73022, tel. +38 (095) 365 67 08, Email: vertigogo@i.ua

References

Ben, A. P. (2012). Liudskyi faktor v avtomatyzovanykh systemakh upravlinnia sudnom ta shliakhy znyzhennia yoho vplyvu. The Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State Maritime Academy, 2(7), 26-30. (in Ukranian)

Kaminsky, V. Y. (2018). The treatment of professional-value aspect of action navigators during simulator training. Marine Intellectual Ttechnologies, 1(39), 209-214. (in Russian)

Kosenko, Y. I., Rosliakova, S. V., & Nosov, P. S. (2013). Systema identyfikatsii funktsionalnoi entropii sub’iekta krytychnoi infrastruktury. Sovremennye napravleniya teoreticheskikh i prikladnykh issledovaniy: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov po materialam Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy Internet-konferentsii (19–30 marta 2013 g.). (рр. 50-54).Odessa. (in Ukranian)

Xi, Y. T., Yang, Z. L., Fang, Q. G., Chen, W. J., & Wang, J. (2017). A new hybrid approach to human error probability quantification–applications in maritime operations. Ocean Engineering, 138, 45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.04.018 (in English)

Arslan, O. (2007). Effects of Fatigue on Navigation Officers and SWOT Analyze for Reducing Fatigue Related Human Errors on Board. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 1(3). 345-349. (in English)

Berg, H. P. (2013). Human Factors and Safety Culture in Maritime Safety (revised). TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 7(3), 343-352. doi: 10.12716/1001.07.03.04 (in English)

Turan, O., Kurt, R. E., Arslan, V., Silvagni, S., Ducci, M., Liston, P., … Papadakis, G. (2016). Can We Learn from Aviation: Safety Enhancements in Transport by Achieving Human Orientated Resilient Shipping Environment. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 1669-1678. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.132 (in English)

Dixena, D., Chakraborty, B., & Debnath, N. (2011). Application of Case-based reasoning for ship turning emergency to prevent collision. 2011 9th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics.Lisbon. doi: 10.1109/indin.2011.6034956 (in English)

Ser-Giacomi, E., Rossi, V., López, C., & Hernández-García, E. (2015). Flow networks: A characterization of geophysical fluid transport. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 25(3). doi: 10.1063/1.4908231 (in English)

Jech, T. (2003). Set Theory.Berlin;Heidelberg: Springer. doi: 10.1007/3-540-44761-X (in English)

Lazarowska, A. (2013). Safe Ship Control Method with the Use of Ant Colony Optimization. Solid State Phenomena, 210, 234-244. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.210.234 (in English)

Magnus, W., Karrass, А., & Solitar, D. (1976). Combinatorial group theory: presentation of groups in terms of generators and relations.New York:DoverPublications. (in English)

Osekowska, E., Axelsson, S., & Carlsson, B. (2015). Potential Fields in Modeling Transport over Water. Transport of Water Versus Transport over Water (рр. 259-280). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-16133-4_14 (in English)

Özdemir, Ü., & Güneroğlu, A. (2015). Strategic Approach Model for Investigating the Cause of Maritime Accidents. PROMET-Traffic&Transportation, 27(2), 113-123. doi: 10.7307/ptt.v27i2.1461 (in English)

Carotenuto, A., Fasanaro, A. M., Molino, I., Sibilio, F., Saturnino, A., Traini, E., & Amenta, F. (2013). The Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) for assessing stress of seafarers on board merchant ships. International Maritime Health, 64(4), 215-220. doi: 10.5603/imh.2013.0007 (in English)

Yang, C., Gao, J., Du, J., Wang, H., Jiang, J., & Wang, Z. (2017). Understanding the Outcome in the Chinese Changjiang Disaster in 2015: A Retrospective Study. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 52(2), 197-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.08.013 (in English)

Zhang, L., Lu, J., & Ai, Y. (2014). Analyzing Human Error in Maritime Transportation in ChinaBased on Game Theory. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Transportation Science & Engineering), 6, 1282-1290. (in English)

Downloads

Published

2018-11-22

How to Cite

Nosov, P. S., Palamarchuk, I. V., Safonov, M. S., & Novikov, V. I. (2018). MODELING THE MANIFESTATIONS OF THE HUMAN FACTOR OF THE MARITIME CREW. Science and Transport Progress, (5(77), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.15802/stp2018/147937

Issue

Section

Mechanical Engineering