OUTLOOKS OF USING DBN B.2.6-161:2017 «WOODEN STRUCTURES» IN DESIGN PRACTICE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15802/stp2019/158181

Keywords:

wooden structures, timber structures, codes, standard, DBN В.2.6-161, 2017, 2010, SNiP ІІ-25-80

Abstract

Purpose. From 01.02.2018, the new state standards DBN B.2.6-161:2017 were introduced into the wooden structures design practice. They replace the recently prepared codes DBN B.2.6-161:2010, which, in turn, were elaborated to replace the SNiP II-25-80. The author of this publication would like to draw the attention of developers and potential users of the codes DBN B.2.6-161:2017 to the points that are not entirely clear, which at first reading caused him certain difficulties in terms of their practical use. Methodology. The practical experience accumulated by the author in the use of normative literature in educational practice, as well as the available experience during laboratory studies with students, made it possible to estimate the recently introduced codes DBN B.2.6-161:2017 from a practical point of view. Findings. In general, the new codes, recently introduced into design practice, are progressive both in their content and in terms of their use in construction practice. However, the existing problem areas in these standards, which are considered in this publication, in our opinion, can significantly limit the possibility of their wide practical application. Originality. The analysis of recently introduced new standard was carried out by the author of the publication not only in terms of assessing quality requirements and recommendations, but also in terms of the quantitative aspect of the issue. Practical value. The author’s experience in calculating simple elements and basic types of connections according to the new codes DBN B.2.6-161:2017 indicates that the bearing capacity determined for various cases is lower on average by 1.5 – 3 times than according to the previous codes SNiP II-25-80. From a practical point of view, this revealed discrepancy means that the already constructed structures may require some reinforcement or reconstruction, and new designed structures should have large bearing sections of the elements and, accordingly, large bearing capacity and weight.

Author Biography

D. О. Bannikov, Dnipro National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan

Dep. «Construction Production and Geodesy», Dnipro National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan, Lazaryan St., 2, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49010, tel. +38 (063) 400 43 07, e-mail dnuzt@diit.edu.ua

References

Systema nadiinosti ta bezpeky v budivnytstvi. Navantazhennia i vplyvy. Normy proektuvannia, 70 DBN В.1.2-2:2006 (2007). (in Ukrainian)

Systema zabezpechennia nadiinosti ta bezpeky budivelnykh ob’iektiv. Zahalni pryntsypy zabezpechennia nadiinosti ta konstruktyvnoi bezpeky budivel, sporud, budivelnykh konstruktsii ta osnov, 46 DBN В.1.2-14-2009 (2010). (in Ukrainian)

Betonni ta zalizobetonni konstruktsii. Osnovni polozhennia, 73 DBN В.2.6-98:2009 (2011). (in Ukrainian)

Derev’iani konstruktsii. Osnovni polozhennia, 111 DBN В.2.6-161:2017 (2017). (in Ukrainian)

Konstruktsii budynkiv i sporud. Derev’iani konstruktsii. Osnovni polozhennia, 102 DBN В.2.6-161:2010 (2011). (in Ukrainian)

Kam’iani ta armokam’iani konstruktsii. Osnovni polozhennia, 107 DBN В.2.6-162:2010 (2011). (in Ukrainian)

Aliuminiievi konstruktsii. Osnovni polozhennia, 78 DBN В.2.6-165:2011 (2012). (in Ukrainian)

Stalevi konstruktsii. Normy proektuvannia, 205 DBN В.2.6-198:2014 (2014). (in Ukrainian)

Derevyannye konstruktsii. Normy proektirovaniya, 31 SNiP II-25-80 (1983). (in Russian)

Posobie po proektirovaniyu derevyannykh konstruktsiy (k SNiP ІІ-25-80). (1986). Moscow: Stro-yizdat. (in Russian)

Huslysta, H. E., & Bannikov, D. O. (2011). Otsinka vazhlyvosti vrakhuvannia neliniinykh vlas-tyvostei systemy «sporuda–gruntovyi masyv» pry vyznachenni yii napruzheno-deformovanoho stanu. Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport, 37, 155-160. (in Ukrainian)

Klymenko, V. Z. (2000). Konstruktsii z dereva i plastmas: pidruchnyk dlia vuziv. Kyiv: Vyshcha shkola. (in Ukrainian)

Slitskoukhov, Y. V., Budanov, V. D., Gappoev, M. M., Guskov, I. M., Makhutova, Z. B., Osvenskiy, B. A., … Filimonov, E. V. (1986). Konstruktsii iz dereva i plastmass: uchebnik dlya vuzov. Moscow: Stroyizdat. (in Russian)

Bofang, Z. (2018). The Finite Element Method: Fundamentals and Applications in Civil, Hydraulic, Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons Singapore Pte. Ltd. doi: 10.1002/9781119107323 (in English)

Jeska, S., & Pascha, K. S. (2014). Emergent Timber Technologies. Basel: Birkhäuser. doi: 10.1515/9783038216162 (in English)

Liu, G. R., & Quek, S. S. (2014). The Finite Element Method. A Practical Course. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. doi: 10.1016/C2012-0-00779-X (in English)

Misztal, B. (2018). Wooden Domes. History and Modern Times. Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-65741-7 (in English)

Singiresu, S. R. (2018). The Finite Element Method in Engineering (6th ed.). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. doi: 10.1016/c2016-0-01493-6 (in English)

Published

2019-03-01

How to Cite

Bannikov D. О. (2019). OUTLOOKS OF USING DBN B.2.6-161:2017 «WOODEN STRUCTURES» IN DESIGN PRACTICE. Science and Transport Progress, (1(79), 167–174. https://doi.org/10.15802/stp2019/158181

Issue

Section

TRANSPORT CONSTRUCTION