PLAGIARISM DETECTION PROBLEMS AND ANALYSIS SOFTWARE TOOLS FOR ITS SOLVE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15802/stp2017/94034

Keywords:

plagiarism, taxonomy of plagiarism, borrowing fragments, plagiarism detection system

Abstract

Purpose. This study is aimed at: 1) the definition of plagiarism in texts on formal and natural languages, building a taxonomy of plagiarism; 2) identify major problems of plagiarism detection when using automated tools to solve them; 3) Analysis and systematization of information obtained during the review, testing and analysis of existing detection systems. Methodology. To identify the requirements of the software to detect plagiarism apply methods of analysis of normative documentation (legislative base) and competitive tools. To check the requirements of the testing methods used and GUI interfaces review. Findings. The paper considers the concept of plagiarism issues of proliferation and classification. A review of existing systems to identify plagiarism: desktop applications, and online resources. Highlighting their functional characteristics, determine the format of the input and output data and constraints on them, customization features and access. Drill down system requirements is made. Originality. The authors proposed schemes complement the existing hierarchical taxonomy of plagiarism. Analysis of existing systems is done in terms of functionality and possibilities for use of large amounts of data. Practical value. The practical significance is determined by the breadth of the problem of plagiarism in various fields. In Ukraine, develops the legal framework for the fight against plagiarism, which requires the active solution development tasks, improvement and delivery of relevant software (PO). This work contributes to the solution of these problems. Review of existing programs, Anti-plagiarism, as well as study and research experience in the field and update the concept of plagiarism, the strategy allows it to identify more fully articulate to the functional performance requirements, the input and output of the developed software, as well as to identify the features of such software. The article focuses on the features of solving the problem of identification of borrowing in an academicenvironment.

Author Biographies

V. I. Shynkarenko, Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after academician V. Lazaryan

Dep. «Computer and Information Technologies», Lazaryan St., 2, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49010, tel. +38 (056) 373 15 35

O. S. Kuropiatnyk, Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after academician V. Lazaryan

Dep. «Computer and Information Technologies», Lazaryan St., 2, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49010, tel. +38 (056) 373 15 35

References

ANTIPLAGIAT.VUZ. Rukovodstvo polzovatelya. Funktsionalnye vozmozhnosti rabochikh mest prepodavatelya, ministratora, menedzhera. (2011). Moscow: NGU. Retrieved from http://antiplagiat.nsu.ru/files/manual.pdf

eTxt Antiplagiat: Proverka unikalnosti tekstov. (n.d.) Retrieved from https://www.etxt.ru/antiplagiat/

Bolilyi, V. O., & Kopotii, V. V. (2011). Perevirka unikalnosti tekstu pry otsiniuvanni studentskykh robit tvorchoho abo doslidnytskoho kharakteru. Naukovi zapysky Naukovi zapysky Nizhynskoho derzhavnoho universytetu im. M. Hoholia. Seriia: Psykholoho-pedahohichni nauky, 7, 134-145.

Golunov, S. V. (2010). Plagiarism in students as challenge to higher education system in Russia and abroad. Educational Studies, 3, 243-257.

Luparenko, L. A. (2014). Plagiarism detection tools for research works: analysis of software solutions. Informatsiini tekhnolohii i zasoby navchannia, 40(2), 151-169.

Mikhaylovskiy, Y. B., & Dlugunovych, N. A. (2013). Anti-plagiarism system as a tool for plagiarism preventing in educational and research activities. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho natsionalnoho universytetu: Tekhnichni nauky, 3, 162-168.

TEXT.RU: Onlayn servis proverki teksta na unikalnost. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://text.ru/

Foreksis: Antiplagiat. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://www.forecsys.ru/ru/site/products/antiplagiat/

Pro avtorske pravo ta sumizhni prava: Zakon Ukrainy 1994, No 1651-19 (2016). Retrieved from http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3792-12

Romanova, I. V. (2012). Yavyshche plahiatu: istoriia ta sohodennia. Foreign trade: economics, finance, law, 3(62), 267-272.

Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainy 2003, No 1666-19 (2016). Retrieved from http://zakon0.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15

Shostak, I. V., & Hruzdo, I. V. (2013). Kompiuteryzatsiia protsesu vyiavlennia plahiatu u studentskykh robotakh. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Viiskovoho instytutu Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka, 41, 99-109.

Shtefan, O. (2011). Plagiarism: the concept, attributes, responsibility. Teoriia i praktyka intelektualnoi vlasnosti, 6, 17-25.

Ali, Asim M. El Tahir, Abdulla, Hussam M. Dahwa, & Snasel, V. (2011, April 20). Overview and Comparison of Plagiarism Detection Tools. Proceedings of the Dateso 2011: Annual International Workshop on DAtabases, TExts, Specifications and Objects, Czech Republic, 161-172. Retrieved from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-706/poster22.pdf

Bin-Habtoor, A. S., & Zaher, M. A. (2012). A Survey on Plagiarism Detection Systems. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, 4(2), 185-188. doi: 10.7763/IJCTE.2012.V4.447

Copyscape. Compare Articles or Web Pages. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://www.copyscape.com/compare.php

Docol©c. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://docoloc.de/

Textbroker: Double Content Finder. (n.d.) Retrieved from https://textbroker.ru/main/dcfinder.html

Culwin, F., & Lancaster, T. (2000). A review of electronic services for plagiarism detection in student submissions. Proceedings of the First Annual Conference of the Learning and Teaching Support Network for Information and Computer Sciences. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.176.8211&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Jarrah, A. Al, Alsmad, I., & Za’atreh, Z. (2011). Plagiarism Detection based on studying correlation between Author, Title and Content. International Conference on Information Communication System (CICS), May 22-24, Irbid, Jordan.

Kakkonen, T., & Myller, N. (2009). AntiPlag – A Sampling-based Tool for Plagiarism Detection in Student Texts. Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on E-learning, October 29-30, Bari, Italy. 287-293.

Meuschke, N., & Gipp, B. (2013). State-of-the-art in detecting academic plagiarism. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 9(1), 50-71. doi: 10.21913/IJEI.v9i1.847

Mozgovoy, M., Kakkonen, T., & Cosma, G. (2010). Automatic Student Plagiarism Detection: Future Perspectives. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(4), 511-531. doi: 10.2190/ec.43.4.e

Mozgovoy, M. (2006). Desktop Tools for Offline Plagiarism Detection in Computer Programs. Informatics in Education, 5(1), 97-112.

OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML), Infrastructure: Version 2.4.1 (2011).

Plagiarisma. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://plagiarisma.net/

Plagiarism-Checker.com. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://www.plagiarism-checker.com/

Plagium:Plagiarism checker & plagiarism detection. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://www.plagium.com/

Plagiarism Detector. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://plagiarismdetector.net/

PlagScan. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://www.plagscan.com/

Plagtracker. The most accurate plagiarism checking service. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://www.plagtracker.com/

Small SEO Tools: Plagiarism Checker. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://smallseotools.com/plagiarism-checker/

StrikePlagiarism.com. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://strikeplagiarism.com/ua/

Unplag.com. Plagiarism Detection Engine. (n.d.) Retrieved from https://ua.unplag.com/

Published

2017-02-24

How to Cite

Shynkarenko, V. I., & Kuropiatnyk, O. S. (2017). PLAGIARISM DETECTION PROBLEMS AND ANALYSIS SOFTWARE TOOLS FOR ITS SOLVE. Science and Transport Progress, (1(67), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.15802/stp2017/94034

Issue

Section

INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AND MATHEMATICAL MODELING